$720
but does not mention In Lead.
The latter no doubt held
in order to get the higher grade pension. This surely hardly worth while to ask his Price about this
viz: why he did not mention In Lead specially by name as the others
Remitendus
he did
Von though it is just doubtful whether
Lum to have
we retrospective
uncements?
Sir J. Hennessy does not condescend
to explain why
he did not submit
increase to
us
nor
for his
Deoli
does he express any regret or apology for leaving of the 28 February 1881, unanswered
till now.
I see from the Woo Where Book, just received, that Coloton has Price absconded but that Watts on their increased salaries, drawing according to late Price's scale.
a.a.D.
20/
We cannot refer to Price.
Put it like.
Get Jane
In Rond
M-Meache
RM 15711
20.
292
Lord Kimberley's despatch of 28 Feb:1881 (on 2978) "conveyed the approval of a definite pension", so that question must be regarded as settled.
I agree with M. Karson that the local Government dealt with the question in a very slow way.
I read these papers, Mr Bourdillon the Acting Surveyor General, in May 1878 represented that $720 was not sufficient to annex and secure & retain in the service qualified persons for the Public Work Department.
He recommended the introduction of the merit system, suggesting that a scale of salary rising from $720 to $1200 by increments of $40 would be adopted - as Colonial Engineer, the Surveyor General then acting
$720
but does noh mention In Lead.
the latter no doubt held
inn
order to get the higher gray Jension This Souffore hardly worth while to ask hits Price about this
riz: why he did not mention In Lead Specially by name as the others
Remitendus
he did
Von though it in jush doubtful whether
Luin to have
we trospective
uncements?
Sii J. Hennessy doe's noh condescend
to explain why
Le did not submich
increase to
us
nar
for his
Deoli
does he expres any refer / Beef: applech or for leaving of the 28 Febenary 1881. at unanswand
till now.
a. a
.9.20/1 Ihaffears from the woo Where Book, just received, that Coloton has Price alsconded but Hat watts o
Ale
Day
their increased solares,
drawing according to tato Pure's feofonal.
a.a.D.
20/
We
e pred pot refer to price.
Putf Ittik.
Get Jane
In Rond
M-Meache
RM 15711
20.
292
Lord Kimberley's despatch of 28 Feb:1801 (on 2978) " conveyed the approval of a definite
pension",
regarded.
so that question must be.
as settled-
Aut Jagree with M. Karson that
the local Government dealt with the question
slovely way
of the salary in co
very
I read these papers, Mr Bourdler the Acting Survey or Gan, anal in May 1878 representia that $9720 was not sufficient son anexation & secum &retain in the service qualified Perseers for the Public Work Department. The
recommended the &'introduction of the meremant
Systema, Haffected that a scale of selario, Lizing from 1720 6 #1200 by revenants of $40 would bears should be adopted - M.
as Colonial Brice, the Surveys General then acting
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.